Australia’s financial dispute resolution scheme has for the first time recorded 100,000 complaints in a calendar year – just ahead of the fifth anniversary of the Hayne Financial Services Royal Commission. 

“The volume of complaints escalated to AFCA has been increasing at an unsustainable rate,” David Locke, the Chief Ombudsman and Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), said.  

“Scam-related complaints to AFCA have nearly doubled between 2022 and 2023. They continue to be of great concern to us. We are also seeing the impact of increased interest rates and cost of living pressures, with complaints involving financial hardship also significantly higher,” Mr Locke said. 

In 2023 the Australian Financial Complaints Authority received 102,790 complaints from consumers and small businesses who were unable to resolve disputes directly with their financial firms. This was a jump of 23 per cent on 2022, according to the preliminary data snapshot. 

Consumers secured $304 million in compensation and refunds after coming to AFCA, which was up 38 per cent on the previous year. 

AFCA registered 8,987 complaints related to scams, up 95 per cent from 4,611 in 2022. Complaints involving financial hardship totalled 5,396, up 29 per cent on 2022. 

There were also rises in complaints about other financial products that AFCA covers, which include banking and finance, insurance, investments and advice, and superannuation (see tables below). 

“As we head into the new year our hope for 2024 is that this will be the year that anti-scam initiatives by industry and government finally disrupt this serious and organised crime,” Mr Locke said.  

“We also need to see a downward trend in complaints overall, with financial firms working better to support their customers and to address complaints quickly and efficiently in-house. We believe many financial firms could be doing a better job of handling complaints within their own internal complaints processes, so only the most complex cases reach AFCA – which is the role we are meant to play,” Mr Locke said. “Instead, the volume of complaints reaching us is putting unnecessary pressure on the external dispute resolution system and inevitably causing further delays for consumers.” 

He noted that in their final full year the three schemes that preceded AFCA received 52,000 complaints between them, about half the volume AFCA is now seeing.  

AFCA was set up after the 2017 Ramsay Review recommended the establishment of a single scheme to handle disputes formerly handled by the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. It began work on 1 November 2018, just months ahead of the final report of the Hayne Royal Commission in February 2019.

Since starting operations, AFCA has received more than 420,000 complaints, helping to secure $1.3 billion in compensation or refunds for consumers. In addition, AFCA’s systemic issues work – where it identifies wider issues than a single complaint – has resulted in 4.9 million people receiving more than $380 million. 

“The Ramsay and Hayne reports both highlighted the room for improvement. Five years on, our work as an ombudsman service shows that the need for a strong consumer protection framework remains,” Mr Locke said.

Top 5 products complained about in 2023

Top 5 issues complained about in 2023

Note to editors 

• AFCA’s full analysis of its data is conducted on a financial year basis. This calendar year data is a snapshot, at the ‘headline’ numbers level, and not broken down further. 
• A comment piece authored by Chief Ombudsman David Locke is available for republication. It can be accessed here.

Published: 9 January 2024 

Media enquiries: media@afca.org.au 

About AFCA 

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) is a non-government ombudsman service providing free, fair and independent help with financial disputes. AFCA is a one-stop-shop for consumers and small businesses who have a dispute with their financial firm, over things such as banking, credit, insurance, advice, investments or superannuation. Where an agreement cannot be reached between parties, AFCA can issue decisions that are binding on financial firms.